Tag Archives: Philosophy of Preaching

On the Lack of Deep Biblical Preaching in the Church Today

teaching_preaching_church_teachers

When I was in seminary, it was pretty commonplace to hear my fellow classmates lamenting the lack of deep biblical preaching in churches today. These were pastors, teachers, and missionaries in training, and, certainly, their passion for the preaching office in the church is to be lauded. However, I think that in our zeal for deep preaching, it would be easy to develop an overly critical attitude when listening to sermons being preached. Nevertheless, as listeners, we must be discerning of what we hear. The difficulty is that the very concept of deep preaching is somewhat nebulous. What makes a particular sermon deep? What are the defining characteristics of a deep sermon? It is probably easier to define what deep preaching is not as opposed to what it is, so in that regard, what follows are some guidelines for identifying what deep preaching is not.

Deep preaching is not a seminary lecture. Preaching is not the time for an information dump of all that a preacher knows about a given passage. A seminary lecture has as its primary purpose to educate and to inform, and it is set in a classroom setting that is focused primarily on learning. Now, while these purposes certainly overlap with that of a sermon, they are still two quite distinct entities. A sermon must be catered to the audience and context for which it is intended, and it must be more than the dissemination of information.

Deep preaching is not a lesson in Greek or Hebrew. Studying the original languages of Holy Scripture is certainly a valuable, and I think it is a necessary resource for sharpening a pastor’s understanding of a given passage. But the pulpit is not the place to be giving vocabulary lessons. Use the original languages to inform your study, but then translate that meaning into the sermon in a way that people who have never been exposed to the original languages can understand. And don’t try to pronounce or include words from the original language in order to impress people with how much you know.

Deep preaching is not locked in the past. Here again, historical analysis and socio-cultural insights are important and helpful for understanding a given passage, and as those details serve to make the meaning of the text clearer, they can and should be included in the sermon to help listeners understand the text. However, a sermon that remains in the past and never brings the meaning forward to the present is not deep. It is merely a history lesson.

Deep preaching is not unnecessarily complex. All of the above leads us to this, that deep preaching is not complex for the sake of being complex. Literary, linguistic, historical, and cultural details all must serve the ultimate purpose of making the meaning of the text clear. Certainly some passages and genres are more demanding than others making the various contextual details necessary, but, ultimately, everything that is said and done in a sermon must relate to overall meaning of the text and serve to make it clear.

Deep preaching is not interested in self help, nor does it seek to entertain. This is perhaps what my seminary peers were concerned with in their laments, but ultimately the purpose of a sermon is not to give helpful advice for life, to make people laugh or feel good about themselves or their lives. The purpose of a sermon is to present listeners with the risen Lord Jesus Christ, to point them to the Gospel and their need for a savior, and to be the avenue the Spirit uses to call people to repentance and faith.

Now, let me be clear, I love studying the literary/grammatical and historical sociocultural contexts of the Bible, but expository preaching must not content itself with what the Biblical authors once said. No, it must move forward to what the Spirit is saying. So, in that light, let us move on to what deep preaching is.

Deep preaching is focused on the text. Let the main thing be the main thing, and the main thing in preaching is the text of Holy Scripture. It is the text that is inspired by the Holy Spirit, it is the text that the Spirit uses to touch hearts and change lives, and it the text that ultimately holds up Jesus as the author and finisher of our faith. In the sermon, pastors should not be giving their opinions or addressing their favorite soapboxes or hobbyhorses or whatever may be the hot topic from the news cycle that week. As Paul told the young pastor Timothy, “Preach the Word!” (2 Tim. 4:2)

Deep preaching is geared toward life change. The Bible refers to it as edification, but all that really means is that preaching is for the purpose of making more faithful disciples of Jesus Christ. That should be the goal in all we do from pulpit to piano to parking lot, to equip people for living this thing called the Christian life. Ultimately, we know that true life change is brought about by the Spirit, and the Word is His sword. Preachers are the handles of that sword as they faithfully proclaim the Spirit inspired message of Holy Scripture week in and week out, so that the Spirit can do His work of transforming sinful human beings into the image of Jesus Christ.

Deep preaching comes from a place of personal conviction. If a pastor has not been personally touched, convicted, comforted, challenged, or changed by a particular passage or sermon, then he should not be preaching it. This means that in addition to historical and literary study of the text, the preacher should be spending time in those classic word centered spiritual disciplines, i.e. meditation, prayer, and fasting, so that the truth of the Scripture is burned into his very soul. Preaching from a place of Spirit led conviction yields spiritual power, authenticity, and real life to the sermon being preached. If you want your listeners to be changed by the sermon you are preaching, then you had better be changed by it too.

See also Edwards, J. Kent. Deep Preaching: Creating Sermons that Go Beyond the Superficial. Nashville, Tenn.: B&H Academic, 2009.


On Hermeneutics & Interpreting the Bible

I once heard a pastor say, “It doesn’t really matter what people think about the Bible.” He went on to explain that, in this statement, he is addressing a (mostly) “bible-belt phenomenon” in which people get together for informal Bible studies, “pool their collective ignorance”, and without any real authority on the matter claim “Well, I think the text means this or that.” He concludes that this practice reflects a break down of basic hermeneutical skills, because it empties the text of its objective meaning by making it dependent upon what a person brings to it.

Now, let me just say that I share this pastor’s concern. In our study of the Biblical text, we must give interpretive priority to the meaning that the original authors – both divine and human – intended in light of their historical and cultural context. However, it would be easy for someone with no seminary or bible college training to infer from this that it is impossible to really understand the Bible without the proper training in hermeneutics & Bible study methods. From this, they might even conclude that it is pointless to even read/study the Bible on their own or that they should really just leave study of the Bible to the “experts” (read scholars/pastors) who have been trained to do it. As the Apostle Paul would say, “May it never be!”

In other words, we must affirm, as one of our fundamental theological values, something called the perspicuity of Scripture. We must believe that the message of Holy Scripture is essentially clear and understandable to any and all who are willing to open its pages. Of course, this does not mean that every nuance is easily defined or that there are no obstacles to overcome in the interpretive process. However, it does mean that God has revealed himself in the Bible in a way that He meant for us to be able to understand.

Scripture can be and is read with profit, with appreciation and with transformative results. It is open and transparent to earnest readers; it is intelligible and comprehensible to attentive readers. Scripture itself is coherent and obvious. It is direct and unambiguous as written; what is written is sufficient. Scripture’s concern or focal point is readily presented as the redemptive story of God. It displays a progressively more specific identification of that story, culminating in the gospel of Jesus Christ. All this is to say: Scripture is clear about what it is about. (Callahan, The Clarity of Scripture, 9)

Secondly, as pastors and teachers, if we truly believe that a basic understanding of hermeneutical principles and bible study methods is necessary in the study of the bible – and it is – then we should include this as a foundational part of the teaching/preaching ministry of the church, both implicitly and explicitly. Implicitly, we must model good hermeneutics in the pulpit; yes, our lessons and sermons must serve as examples of how to study the Bible well. We must let principles like authorial intent, historical/cultural context, literary flow-of-thought, and the big idea guide us in our sermon/teaching preparation. We must give first priority to what the text says over our own thoughts (read soapboxes). On the other hand, explicitly, we should make it a goal to teach people how to study the Bible, both from the pulpit in a large gathering and in a small group setting. People need to understand the contours of the biblical genres, and they need to know how to evaluate and use the wide range of Bible study resources that are so readily available in today’s information culture. They could even stand to learn a little about the biblical languages and how they work. In other words, our goal in preaching and teaching should be to work ourselves out of a job, i.e. to teach people how to study and understand the Bible for themselves.

Lastly, we should trust the Holy Spirit. He is the one who inspired Holy Scripture, and He is the one who illuminates our minds to its truths. Moreover, He is the one who applies those truths in our lives to bring about radical lifechange. In other words, engaging in the study of the Bible without giving attention to the work of the Spirit can never be more than historical investigation, no matter how consistently the principles of hermeneutics are applied. We must remember that Bible study is one of the spiritual disciplines by which the Spirit makes us more like Christ, and He can be trusted to testify to the truth. (John 14:26, 15:26, 16:12-15) This does not negate the role of the preacher/Bible teacher, but it does move our dependency from fallible human beings to the Holy Spirit of God. He is the only infallible interpreter of Scripture.

Ultimately, hermeneutical considerations are a means to an end, and that end is a more accurate and clearer understanding the biblical text itself. Studying hermeneutics gives us the basic skills and tools to understand the Bible better, i.e. the way the original audience would have understood it, the way that the inspired authors intended for it to be understood. So, what we need to say is: “It doesn’t matter what people think; it matters what the text says!”


Slow To Write

"let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger."

lovegavehope

Just another WordPress.com site

Jared Cornutt

Pastor | Speaker | Writer

Denny Burk

A commentary on theology, politics, and culture

G3 Ministries

Events + Resources for the Local Church

Biblical Reasoning

Biblical and Systematic Theology According to the Scriptures

RetroChristianity

Reclaiming the Forgotten Faith

SBC Voices

Southern Baptist News & Opinion

Lucid Theology

Thoughts on words, books, theology, and life.

Baptist21

A pastor-led voice for Baptists in the 21st century

Center For Baptist Renewal

The Personal and Professional Blog of Phillip Powers

The Pastor's Well - Pastor Well

The Personal and Professional Blog of Phillip Powers

Articles - AlbertMohler.com

The Personal and Professional Blog of Phillip Powers

The Gospel Coalition

The Personal and Professional Blog of Phillip Powers